Proof a well-placed thought is a deadly weapon.

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Example of paternalism

Spotted in an article about the judicial nominations battle:

[Senator Patrick] Leahy charged that Bush's choice of [Janice Rogers] Brown was "another divisive, ideologically driven nomination" and that her "extreme record has earned her the opposition of African-American leaders, law professors, and newspapers around the country." Leahy said the Congressional Black Caucus and leading civil rights groups oppose Brown's nomination. (Emphasis mine)

Leave aside the question of whether or not she actually is an extremist for a moment. Isn't Leahy basically saying, in a roundabout way, that since Janice Rogers Brown is not a flaming "progressive" she is somehow not truly black? I don't see him making this kind of narrow arguement towards any of the other nomineees, do you?

Her f#@$ing skin should be enough, Senator...

You know you're bored if...

You open up a site like this and start doing quizzes. Apparently I...

-am somewhat honest but mostly dishonest:

Sometimes you do the right thing, but not often
You prefer to look out for yourself most of the time
But sometimes honesty does get the better of you
Here's hoping you answered this quiz honestly


-belong in 1969:

You are a free spirit with a huge heart. Love, peace, and happiness rule - oh, and drugs too.

-have as my dominant intelligence Linguistics:

You are excellent with words and language. You explain yourself well.
An elegant speaker, you can converse well with anyone on the fly.
You are also good at remembering information and convicing someone of your point of view.
A master of creative phrasing and unique words, you enjoy expanding your vocabulary.


-have as my "Famous Blogger Twin" Andrew Sullivan. True in more ways than one, considering we're both thought of as cultural contradictions (he a gay catholic, I a right-wing negro).

-have an Inner European that is French (LOL!)

-should try whitewater rafting

-am almost nothing like my zodiac sign would suggest (if I believed in that astrology crap): You are 33% Gemini

-don't know much about 80's music (good! If it wasn't hip-hop it was wack):
You scored 35% correct. You know some 80s stuff
Like that Paula Abdul was a star back then
But you're not sure who Suzie Q was
And you don't know what Samantha Fox was really famous for!


-am somewhat schizotypal:
A bit odd and socially isolated.
You couldn't care less of what others think.
And some of your beliefs are a little weird.
Like that time you thought you were Jesus.


-Am more bored that even I thought I was....wow.

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

WTF is wrong with Blogger?????

Tried to correct a simple address mistake, and after taking forever for the template change to go through, I find out it dropped everything below the blogroll, meaning my archives links and my "other useful links" section are wiped out, and the button that says "powered by blogger" goes away.

So I go to try to fix it only to find out there is no copy of the template, only the "sample" one which means I have to figure out which lines go where when I copy/paste. I put in what I think are the lines, and they end up not in the sidebar, but at the bottom of the page in an awkward ass white area -- with none of the links. And the entire process has been slow as molasses.

***update*** fixed it, never mind.

Prepare to be offended...

So they have a (new) pope...

VATICAN CITY, April 19 -- Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church elected Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of Germany Tuesday as the new pope to succeed John Paul II, and announced he will take the name of Benedict XVI.

"Dear brothers and sisters, after the great pope John Paul II, the cardinals have elected me -- a simple, humble worker in the vineyard of the Lord," the new pope said in Italian in a brief speech from a balcony of St. Peter's Basilica.


Ok, it's obvious I'm going to be skeptical because I'm not religious, let alone catholic. But something about catholicism has always smugly amused me, even before I became pretty much an atheist. I mean, the hierarchy of people effectively determining what the religion means, the paegentry of all the fancy costumes & flashy traditions, the idea that an elite group that is still of mankind can pick a person to speak for God...frankly it all gives me the Huh's.

I think this type of spectacle, along with the tendency throughout history for religious doctrine to be used to justify mass murder, is exactly what drove me towards being a heathen. I mean, when people ask I tell them I'm an atheist, but that's not quite accurate. See, if I had more time, I'd explain like this:

The thing to ask isn't whether or not there is a "god". Obviously that cannot be proven by the very nature of the question. However, one doesn't necessarily have to define that which we don't comprehend as being of some mythical guy-in-the-sky. I do believe that there are things that are well beyond the comprehension of man, regardless of what someone chooses to call them. What I do NOT believe, and never will again, is the gross contradiction that mankind can somehow define them in a manner clear enough to derive rules from them.

Either we know or we don't, if we don't then let it be. Far as I'm concerned, regardless of what is out there it is conceited and utterly pointless to attempt to craft a construct out of it, so the most reasonable thing to do is to remain oblivious to it and go about our lives.

Less confrontational bloggage of the Pope-ification here, here, and here.

Other confrontational coverage from some non-heathens:

-Bainbridge slaps at Reuters for basically assuming on what they couldn't possibly know about, then runs off to class.

-Andrew Sullivan, meanwhile, is hella dissappointed...

***update: 6:34 PM***

-Bainbridge gets back from class, looks at Sullivan's remarks, and calls him out as hysterical:

I realize that calling Sullivan an ass is not very charitable, but sometimes you just have to state harsh truths....It's always about sex with Andrew, isn't it?

-Sullivan has also been getting remarks from other believers basically telling him to leave catholicism. I personally agree with that, though obviously for different reasons...

It is virtually impossible to simultaneously interact with modern society and follow a religion to the letter....Taking religious doctrine literally requires a complete divorce from any visible strain of contemporary life.

Religion in the West is pretty much treated like smoking -- something people occasionally turn to in order to ease stress of some sort, regardless of long-term damage. If it doesn't work, why keep puffing away?

-The Moderate Voice has an extensive roundup of reaction.